Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disha Dinakar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Being a "famous actress" on its own is not enough to establish notability. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Disha Dinakar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:TOOSOON and fails WP:GNG: The actress has only appeared in one film so far and the notability of the film is also questionable. I failed to find decent coverage in independent secondary reliable sources for a stand-alone article at least not yet. GSS (talk) 11:53, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 11:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk) 11:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete unless the role is huge, one film is just not enough for notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Sir, I know about her. She is a Famous actress. She acted in one film but she is the heroine. The film got good response and so many medias talked about Disha's performance (137.97.121.33 (talk) 05:40, 11 December 2016 (UTC))


 * Delete. Non-notable actress. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:24, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * She is a notable actress (137.97.57.203 (talk) 18:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC))


 * Delete - Agree, she fails WP:NACTOR and this is WP:TOOSOON. --  Dane talk  00:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.