Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disinformation (art and music project) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 10:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Disinformation (art and music project)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Procedural nom. This was prod tagged and deleted as part of User:Oo7565's random-deletion-tagging spree. However, it's already survived an AFD discussion before and certainly looks at least potentially notable, so I've undeleted and set up a procedural AFD discussion. Procedural nom, so I abstain. –  iride scent  22:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Weak delete The article goes on at great length about this "project," and drops a lot of names, but is lacking references. It seems to be somewhat biographical and to contain original research. If multiple reliable and independent sources can be found, I would not oppose keeping it. Edison (talk) 23:22, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  —Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:41, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, per Edison. Tempshill (talk) 00:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per Edison. Renaissancee (talk) 01:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.