Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disk Expert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jujutacular (talk) 02:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Disk Expert

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't seem to be covered in sufficient independent sources. Of the five sources currently listed, three don't mention the product, one is a press release, and one is the company's site. Looking further I can find some mentions online and reviews in one or two, but nothing substantial that can establish notability. - Bilby (talk) 23:58, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as it stands. (Part of a cluster of spam-magnet articles for non-notable OS X software, too.) - David Gerard (talk) 14:59, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not covered in the independent sources. -- Dane 2007  talk 18:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Page's current references are poor. Not much else out there detailing the software. Meatsgains (talk) 01:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.