Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Junior logo variations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Very clear consensus.  DGG ( talk ) 22:42, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Disney Junior logo variations

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A completely unreferenced and unnotable list of trivia. The article was already deleted once by PROD for being WP:Original Research, however the original page creator promptly just recreated the page. It was tagged again for PROD, however the PROD tag was removed without explanation. I would suggest that it be merged to Disney Junior, except the entire article is just a list of random trivia with no notability, and thus there is nothing here worth actually keeping in the merge. Rorshacma (talk) 08:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Thoroughly non-notable, unencyclopedic and trivial. Completely fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE Should probably be WP:SALTed if it's being recreated, because I can't imagine under which circumstances we'd want a page under that name. --Slashme (talk) 09:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete As per Slashme -  Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 11:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete I deleted this from the Disney Junior article two months ago as unsourced junk and would object to re-adding this to the article once again as something only the obsessives care about. Salt it, please, it's just text that looks like cartoon characters, and complete cruft.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 18:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 29 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - I found some information in Variety about the Disney Junior logo itself here: Disney Junior branding effort launches, but not about logo variations as presented in the article. Topic doesn't appear to have been addressed in reliable sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete; far too trivial, and there's not one source, reliable or no. This isn't exactly the NBC peacock, folks… no one seems to be clamoring for information about variants of a logo for a block and cable channel, even if it's true. That this was already deleted for being original research obviously isn't going to bode well for this article ever actually persisting… -- WC  Quidditch  &#9742;   &#9998;  03:27, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.