Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney XD on Disney Channel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:05, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Disney XD on Disney Channel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTTVGUIDE. A block of programming doesn't need its own article. No independent notability. No significant coverage in reliable sources. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 04:30, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:52, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - We already have Disney XD (Europe) & different countries, Nothing to merge, and a useless redirect. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  14:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - There is already a Disney XD article. I'm not sure we need an entire separate article to point out that some of XD programming is shown on disney channel. Surely we could just point that out on the Disney XD article. Bali88 (talk) 19:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Are you kidding me?! This is two hours a week of one network's programming on another network! This is one sentence in the Disney Channel article (a sentence I've been maintaining against the crufters) that doesn't need further elaboration and nobody except Disneycrufters care about. No redirect either.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 03:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable enough to stand on its own two feet. Cruft that can easily be explained in a single sentence either at Disney Channel, if even that is warranted (we are not TV Guide.) I don't understand the need to document every aspect of the channel like hoarders stashing empty tins of jack mackerel in the sofa as if at their funeral someone will think to mention this mundane aspect of their lives. "They were a filthy lot. And they ate canned jack mackerel twice. Rest in peace. Amen." Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:09, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Worst problem I have is inability to verify any of the additions as no references are provided for any of the info. We shouldn't have article where the contents can't be verified. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:10, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.