Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney pins

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was merge/redirect. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:06, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Disney pins
Trivial, nonencyclopedic collectorcruft. Delete. Postdlf 22:53, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * (Note: User:Speedway originally added the link for a vfd on this article to the daily log, but did not add a vfd tag to the article nor fill out this voting page. I'm completing and endorsing his nomination.)  Postdlf 22:55, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, pseudo-ad, trivial, non-encyclopedic collectorcruft. Master Thief Garrett 02:36, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) Keep until such time as it can be Merged with Disneyana. Master Thief Garrett 01:17, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, advert, cruft. Megan1967 04:26, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, I think I gave my reason somewhere on Wikipedia lol....but you all seem to have made your own minds up. --Speedway 10:09, Apr 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * See above, it seems you didn't finish your nomination, or, at least, not correctly... it's hard to remember all those steps... Master Thief Garrett 11:29, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Disney Pin Trading (and merge if anything's worth merging). This is unfortunately a major thing. They have huge kiosks set up in the parks just for pin trading. --SPUI (talk) 12:21, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Just... just... *just* for pin trading? And here I thought LEGO shows would look weird to the uninitiated... But you might be right about redirecting... Master Thief Garrett 12:47, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * merge/redirect to Disney Pin Trading. Lochaber 00:24, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I question whether Disney pin trading should exist either, though you can consider merging there my backup vote if outright deletion fails. I think the general term for Disney collectables is "Disneyana"&mdash;maybe someone knowledgeable should create that and merge both pin articles there.  Postdlf 00:32, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * 43,900 Google matches for "pin trading" disney and 20,900 for "disney pin trading". It's fucking stupid, but a whole lot of people do it. Though I wouldn't oppose a move/merge with Disneyana, I think it's notable enough to stay on its own. --SPUI (talk) 00:48, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Agreed, the other article is a stub as it is. Your Disneyana link doesn't work but it could be Disneymania or Mickeyana or something for all we know. Merge both into the core Disney collectible page, I say... Master Thief Garrett 00:54, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Disneyana would be the page for that; it's just not been created. --SPUI (talk) 00:58, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with SPUI. If and when the Disneyana article is created, this article should be merged into it. I have brought it up to code, and should be kept the way it is (unless edits are necessary) until it can be merged. --Evanwohrman 00:29, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree as well. I'm changing my vote. Master Thief Garrett 01:17, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.