Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disobey unconstitutional

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  12:48, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Disobey unconstitutional
Currently it's just a quote from "16AmJur 2nd, Sec. 177" (don't know what that means). As such it's a useless title with zero context and no content beyond the out-of-context quote. No point to this. Delete. --Dmcdevit 05:43, July 10, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete - in agreement with nominator -mysekurity 06:06, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - same reason as nominator, or merge into a more appropriate article -- perhaps one on the constitutionality of laws? --FreelanceWizard 06:08, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - no point to this article. Dr Gangrene 14:03, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Out of context. -- Natalinasmpf 16:04, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - meaningless. The reference, "16AmJur 2nd, Sec. 177", means volume 16 of American Jurisprudence (a lengthy annually updated encyclopedia of American law), 2nd edtition, section 177 (as it's divided by sections, not pages). -- BD2412 talk 18:53, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not encyclopedic. JamesBurns 08:16, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.