Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disorder (ES band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete (WP:SNOW). King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 20:33, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Disorder (ES band)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete nn band, fails WP:MUSIC Mayalld (talk) 22:26, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  22:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Crimson33: I believe that the user Mayalld checked the article when it didn't have any references yet. Please double check and remove the article from the deletion lists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crimson33 (talk • contribs) 23:23, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I have reviewed the references, and have not seen one that shows notability. Most are not even reliable sources Mayalld (talk) 23:48, 20 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, while not the easiest name to search for, I looked at all the usual metal band sites and could find insufficient independent 3rd party notability to pass WP:MUSIC. I agree with Mayalld, while those ref's in the article prove the band exists, none establish notability.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 09:03, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't delete, I am aware that Wikipedia's policies need to be followed, but you need to consider that we are talking about a band from a third world country, and that regardless of what you may believe, It is a part of that country's heritage, and therefore, it's notability cannot be determined by just googling  it. Crimson33
 * Delete: insufficient 3rd party notability WP:BAND. JamesBurns (talk) 02:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:MUSIC; only one album (on a non-notable label), no significant third party coverage. Geocities sites are just laughable as sources. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 14:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.