Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disorders of Sex Development


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Disorders of Sex Development
Copy of. Wikipedia is not a speech repository. Besides, the copyright is troubling; it's licensed as noncommercial, which is incompatible with GFDL. Finally, WP:NOR, and non-notable. Melchoir 04:24, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, blatant copyvio. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 04:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's a candidate for db-copyvio. And I'd rather not take it to Copyright Problems, because the author might just change the license. Let's just say it doesn't belong here from the start. Melchoir 04:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research (and a speech, which counts as being an essay and exceptionally difficult to NPOV-ise). BigHaz 05:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete there does seem to be some valid content in here but anything worthwhile could be incorporated in current pages. Nigel (Talk) 13:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete- shouldn't notable disorders have their own pages, and even a category?--ZayZayEM 15:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Category:Intersexuality covers several. Melchoir 15:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete source dump. Gazpacho 17:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Night Gyr, but also NN, opinion not fact, "etc. etc. etc." (as per Yul Brynner)... Cain Mosni 14:18, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.