Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disposable energy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Missvain (talk) 05:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Disposable energy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hopelessly WP:OR. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk problem solving 16:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Contains original research and no evidence of concept ever being applied. Snabbkaffe (talk) 16:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – OR, primary sources, no evidence of "disposable energy" in this sense being used anywhere except in other articles by the same author. On the plus side, easy to understand, great graphics. But Wikipedia is not the place for this. – Margin1522 (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -- OR, quotes his own article for definition. Uses primary sources to create a narrative. Red Harvest (talk) 19:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Interesting hypothesis, but WP is not the place to publish it. Gigs (talk) 19:43, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Complete bollocks.— S Marshall  T/C 19:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Brimba (talk) 23:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:57, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom, piling on the WP:SNOW --&mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 23:56, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - The metric of GDP failed to warn of the Sept 2008 economic crash. This metric is used currently to justify building solar-powered mobility networks by JPods, ET3 and others. By deleting this you deprive users access via this wiki to a prime metric used for retooling to sustainable infrastructure and solving the pollution driving climate change. BillJamesMN (talk) 13:06, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I line up behind Bill in the delete column, even if that input wasn't his intention. Cool graphics. Dubious data. Unsourced. Actually everyone already knows this, Bill, so don't worry. Seriously, it's OK, we know every time we gas up. We do the ratio in our head. FeatherPluma (talk) 00:31, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.