Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dispossession Theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Dispossession Theory
Only 9 Ghits? Looks like WP:OR to me, but I brought it up here anyway... M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 | T | C | @ 00:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

NOTE: This may be notable (see cjllw's comment below) but under a different name in English. Please keep this in mind. --M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 (T 21:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Looks original to me too Devotchka 00:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'll third the OR (and nn) sentiment. -- Kicking222 01:10, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sounds like Sufism and Immanuel Kant blended together inelegantly. -  Corbin  Be excellent  01:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete OR, no RS if not. Crum375 01:17, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOR Dominick (TALK) 01:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Osbus 01:44, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 02:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: Crazynas 03:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research. --Ter e nce Ong 03:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- Joe  Jklin  (  T   C  )  06:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Nick C 13:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and if someone finds research that isn't original then they can put it up later. Random the Scrambled 14:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Avi 15:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
 * comment/potential keep. It's not actually original research (in the sense that it is something dreamt up by the contributor); rather it's a brief description of a concept related in the philosophical work Falsafatuna by notable Iraqi Shiite cleric and ulema, Baqir al-Sadr, as can be seen in the work which is available in english online here. Baqir as-Sadr makes the claim in the work that the theory is a particular concept found in Islamic philosophy, and perhaps it is (it may be that it is more commonly translated by some other term in english). Baqir as-Sadr is certainly a notable and quotable source (although the article on his book is also up for deletion), but someone better versed in Islamic philosophy than me needs to establish if it is a particular concept acknowledged and recognised in the field, or whether it is a term only found in Baqir as-Sadr's works (or even, a mis-labelling introduced by his translator).--cjllw | TALK  14:08, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per CJLLW and WP:BITE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hornplease (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.