Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disrespecting the police


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:03, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Disrespecting the police

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

It starts out with a hatnote that the article is about "the worldwide legal term". Only problem is, this isn't a world wide legal term. The article does have some references, but the article is really nothing more than WP:SYNTH or a WP:COATRACK. It merely puts together a few First Amendment cases and arrives at some legal conclusions. Article is filled with weasel words. I don't see a re-write helping. It's not a topic sufficiently different from the better written article Contempt of cop. The weak attempt to throw in a case from Uzbekistan doesn't really help it. Niteshift36 (talk) 03:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, I agree with the above, this is mostly a thinly-veiled synthesis about the USAn First Amendment. J I P  &#124; Talk 05:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Contempt of cop. Erpert (let's talk about it) 05:54, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete This term is not commonly used in reliable sources. Even the four Google books results that use those three words together do so not as an official term, but only in context. First Light (talk) 18:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.