Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissemination


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. No Guru 19:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Dissemination
Del A chaotic essay (on language dissemination) that does not define the term, unreferenced, obscure language. Example: Outside of polysemic distinctions to indicate the sense of a word, we have a dissemination that is ongoing and escapes the univocality of any attempt to indicate a definite semantic from its polysemia. May be I am lazy, but some google search for "dissemination of language" and "language dissemination" did not reveal anything phylosophical. I suggest other voters to observe some diligence. If the article may be rewritten, let it live, but the current text doesn't make much sense (may be I am an idiot). `'mikka (t) 23:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:NOR. --Hetar 23:33, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Hetar. --Starionwolf 23:12, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete The writing of a word entails necessarily the absence of the writer and reader; I think that the writing of delete entails the absence of an article. This is incoherent and if it actually is saying something is so far beyond the faculty of someone not familiar with the subject as to need a complete rewrite. &mdash;WAvegetarian&bull;(talk) 07:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.