Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissolution of the United States


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:11, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Dissolution of the United States

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Likely fits WP:CRYSTAL and WP:UNDUE. Normchou  💬 22:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  Normchou   💬 22:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Delete per WP:TNT. I'd say the topic might be notable, as it has been covered a lot in fiction, but I don't see anything salvageable from the current state of the article. Pladica (talk) 04:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC) Delete In addition to WP:CRYSTAL there is a big list of other relevant issues (see the template at the top of the article). For cases like these you can just use WP:PROD. I wouldn't expect any objection for this nomination.- Renat 12:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. - Amigao (talk) 18:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Delete, Per nom. WP:CRYSTAL. Alex-h (talk) 11:44, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Predictions, speculation, forecasts and theories stated by reliable, expert sources or recognized entities in a field may be included --Vyacheslav84 (talk) 07:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * "though editors should be aware of creating undue bias to any specific point-of-view" Normchou   💬 17:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * This argument is invalid, because the article is written only based on (!) 3 news sources and they do not predict: WP:NOTNEWS. There is not enough coverage for the subject so the article fails to meet WP:GNG. Someone could be tricked with the amount of text in the article, but I checked text-source integrity and can confirm, that the content of the article violates WP:OR. There is no way such amount of text could be extracted out from 3 news sources.-- Renat 10:30, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete just because a few people have speculated about something does not make it a subject that we can actually have an encyclopedic article on.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:23, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BALL. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 21:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NOTESSAY. KidAd   talk  09:02, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.