Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dissolve Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:16, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Dissolve Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promotional and with insufficient evidence of notability  DGG ( talk ) 06:22, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alberta-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:32, 13 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Pure puffery. A company notable for making an advert??. Nonsense.TheLongTone (talk) 09:27, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Run of the mill WP:CORPSPAM. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:15, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi everyone, I'm the author of this article. I'm also pretty new to all of this so sorry if I broke any rules. Not sure if this is the correct way to reply to the nomination for deletion discussion.

I created this separate article, This is a Generic Brand video. It's not so much an advertisement, as it is an indictment of cliches used by advertisers. It's an indirect commentary on formulaic pandering. The video was the first of a trilogy, which went on to mock generic presidential campaign ads as well as stereotypical ads targeting millennials.

It's actually quite brilliant making fun of ads in an ad. It's a double entendre! I discovered these in one of my lectures and felt like these videos deserved to be documented. It's like these troupes describe the socially accepted values during this select moment in time.

Anyway so this article is about the company behind these clever videos. Cool brand. Other company's have wiki articles, shouldn't this be acceptable? TylerDurden213 (talk) 15:39, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, WP:ITSINTERESTING and WP:ITSIMPORTANT. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 01:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.