Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distance (Album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was No consensus. Deathphoenix 16:39, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Clay Sun Union (album) Distance (Album)

 * Delete: Album for a band that doesn't have an article. Neither album, band, nor the band's other album (also in Afd) have any mentions on either Amazon or Allmusic. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:54, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 19:18, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: This nomination seemed to be malformed, so I edited the link to the article.  The group has two albums Distance (Album) and Clay Sun Union (album).  There is already Articles for deletion/Clay Sun Union (album), so I assume this one is for Distance (Album).  I suggest voters are explicit in stating which item they wished deleted (presumabley both or none), and if they think the band should, or shouldn't have an article.  --Rob 21:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Woops, my bad. Copy/paste error.  Trying to manage deleting too many junky articles at the same time.  —Wknight94 (talk) 01:51, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No sweat. For future reference, there is a set of instructions on how to list multiple related articles in a single AFD (I realize its to late now, but it may come in handy next time). --Rob 05:47, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes I've seen this but the other album had more mentions of notability so I thought people might want to keep one and delete the other. Went along with my confusion as to why there were two albums out there for a band that wasn't.  —Wknight94 (talk) 06:09, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for the same reasons as above. -- JJay 22:50, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Johnleemk | Talk 15:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.