Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distant Worlds (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion, period. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Distant Worlds
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Nominating per DRV that was closed as relist at AfD. The original debate concerns the notability of the subject. At DRV, (translation), (translation) are asserted to be the requisite significant coverage in independent sources. Procedural nomination only, I am neutral. Tim Song (talk) 16:40, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:39, 8 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. IGN has it listed. GameSpy has an entry. RPS has an entry. GameZone has is listed. Gamasutra has entry. Of course Russian AG and Dutch Eurogamer as a proper review. Also news on update article. — Hellknowz  ▎talk 19:19, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Evidently notable per the sources listed by Hellknowz. Colonel Warden (talk) 00:12, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep it well sourced (Idot (talk) 00:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC))
 * Keep per above comments. Article should be tagged for expansion and cleanup but not deleted. -Thibbs (talk) 14:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.