Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distaudio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 01:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Distaudio

 * – ( View AfD View log )

no real notability shown for this band. lacks coverage in independent sources. Rave magazine is just a publication "where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves". others are not reliable sources. releases not on important label. airplay not national rotation. nothing satisfying wp:music. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The following is copied from Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Distaudio. duffbeerforme (talk) 08:02, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

"Concerns raised by duffbeerforme are invalid. Rave magazine is part of the street press music media in Brisbane and Distaudio was interviewed in this magazine by a music journalist. All other radio stations and music media are valid, third party references to cite. References have all been updated. I trust there will be no further issues to address. Menschmaster (talk) 05:51, 22 July 2011 (UTC)" 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 28 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong delete created by single purpose editor indicating conflict of interest. nothing in gnews and nothing in Australian search engine trove . no reliable sources no article. LibStar (talk) 16:07, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.