Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DistrictBuilder (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

DistrictBuilder
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This piece of software appears to fail WP:GNG. It has been previously been deleted for lacking significant coverage (at the time, the only source cited was this one, which doesn't give significant coverage). The current sources in the article include a marketing blog, the website of its developer, this Bloomberg piece, a Pew Trusts source that doesn't cover it significantly, and trivial coverage on a Pennsylvania website.

A search through google news reveals lots of trivial coverage (such as namechecks and one-sentence mentions), but I can't find a second source that gives this piece of software significant coverage. As such, I think that this article fails WP:GNG and should be deleted as failing to meet the relevant notability guideline. — Mhawk10 (talk) 01:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  01:24, 6 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics, Software,  and United States of America. — Mhawk10 (talk) 01:10, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.