Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/District Jinnah Public School and College Mandi Bahauddin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

District Jinnah Public School and College Mandi Bahauddin

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Mostly WP:OR, nothing in coverage, fails WP:GNG. BookishReader (talk) 12:29, 10 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 16:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:17, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools,  and Pakistan.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:03, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - As a semi-government institution, it may be notable. It is often visited by government officials: Pakistan Today, Dunya News. Insight 3 (talk) 06:07, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * It seems like government is trying to establish the University of Gujrat sub-campus on the permises of this school and coverage is related to that (mainly news reports that are primary sources). This article says that the university campus is operational, possibly since 2019. A grant was approved in 2005. As this school's status is in limbo and due to lack of significant coverage, I think delete would be the right option. Alternatively, just redirect to University of Gujrat if consensus is reached. BookishReader (talk) 05:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: Single ref is a dead link, and I couldn't find the source. BEFORE showed social media sites, directory style listings, and mentions in relation to other subjects, nothing with SIGCOV from RS. The sources mentioned above do not have SIGCOV of the subject. Except for the name and location, this appears to be entirely an OR booster style page.  // Timothy :: talk  04:47, 2 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.