Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ditte Arnth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 21:35, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Ditte Arnth

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article doesn't meet criteria for notability. A Youtube video and one small role in an unreleased 2010 film doesn't meet any of criteria at WP:ENT. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:34, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * There is a reasonable mentioning in international media (Google News). The original YouTube video seems to have reached 200'000 downloads a day. &mdash; fnielsen (talk) 09:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: According to the news story, the video was pulled and 283 mentions isn't that reasonable. Basically, we've got someone in a video that created a minor YouTube response that is no longer available. The person in the video isn't what would arguably be of interest, it was the video itself. Notability is enduring, this person is not. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:32, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

(talk) 05:34, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I came across this on the bbc website http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8258473.stm - the only article able to shed some light on the actress in English via Google was Wikipedia.

If the deletionists wants to kill the article, then perhaps a short mentioning of this actress could be moved/made on the VisitDenmark article. As far as I can determine the close to a million downloads on the four initial days seems to be impressive for a viral video, e.g., Numa numa seems not to reach that figure. &mdash; fnielsen (talk) 16:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  —Ysangkok (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Ysangkok (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - I agree that she doesn't meet the notability criteria for WP:ENT. However, for good or bad, she probably passes the general notability criteria having received enormous national and international press coverage. The coverage isn't only about the video but include stories and interviews about her in the top Danish newspaper (which includes 10 other stories about the video), and Danish talk shows. Other Danish newspaper stories include "Karen is a Star", "The Woman Behind Karen", "YouTube Mom is named Ditte". Wildhartlivie is correct, she is only a bit part actress who become known for a viral video. But I think the consequence of it probably puts her over the top. (I also suspect her acting roles are going to get larger very quickly). — Cactus Writer |   needles  11:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:08, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW ( Talk ) 23:29, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep per CactusWriter's sources, not too much but it's barely enough. Let's relist this another four times, hmm? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:32, 4 October 2009 (UTC) Delete after re-analyzing the sources, they are indeed more about the video. Notability isn't inherited. Ten Pound Hammer , his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of this article is about the video she acted in, and most of the notability about that seems to be about the content, not the actress.--Derek Andrews (talk) 23:49, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominated. Crafty (talk) 23:55, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.