Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diva Magazine (Pakistan)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 10:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Diva Magazine (Pakistan)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Coverage in mostly in unreliable sources. Fails WP:GNG. BookishReader (talk) 12:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 22:42, 17 June 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 24 June 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment, Fashion,  and Pakistan.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - Its really hard to find coverage for a media in other media. But the title of Pakistan Today: Mahira Khan, Hamza Ali Abbasi sizzle on DIVA Magazine cover and the line in The Nation: Khan was earlier this month recognized as the 2020’s Best Actor for both television and web series by Diva Magazine Pakistan ... suggest the magazine is somewhat notable. Also some Urdu sources mention the magazine in a similar way: Urdu News, Daily Pakistan, Dawn TV news. Insight 3 (talk) 14:39, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I disagree with the rationale above. All of the given sources provide minimal coverage. WP:GNG says that we need significant coverage. No coverage about magazine's history, production, etc.. Carpimaps talk to me! 14:47, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Not every topic can meet the WP:GNG's requirements as it is, that is why we have additional criteria. There is an essay with some reasonable arguments: Why we need separate criteria for media. Insight 3 (talk) 04:44, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - references seem questionable but agree with above, there might be enough for inclusion. It may be harder to find supporting reliable sources for a subject in a market like Pakistan as well. - Indefensible (talk) 01:14, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Insight 3 and Indefensible. Seems to have considerable encyclopedic merit, and to at least brush up against the GNG and WP:NME. -- Visviva (talk) 22:50, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.