Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divebomb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 00:55, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Divebomb

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Fictional character that appears not to pass WP:GNG, sources are all primary, no individual notability asserted. Normally would merge to character list, but no list appears to exist. Black Kite (t) (c) 22:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC) Black Kite (t) (c) 22:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:52, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, major Transformers character. Adding sources. Mathewignash (talk) 01:53, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * if kept rename to Divebomb (Transformers), since this is not the primary usage of the term, it should be replaced by a dab page. 76.66.200.95 (talk) 05:51, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliable, independent sources either originally, or added recently. No Notability established. Skinny87 (talk) 07:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - I wasn't aware a recently added source is not a valid source. However, if it is valid, then your reasoning is flawed and your vote should be ignored. Mathewignash (talk) 09:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I can't see a reliable source in any of the article's citations, just fan-sites and primary sources. Can you identify which one you are referring to, and why it fulfills WP:RS? That way we can have a specific discussion. Skinny87 (talk) 20:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * You are correct, there are still no reliable sources in the article that talk about this particular character. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect - To Predacons unless reliable sources that talk about this character can be found. --Divebomb (talk) 10:04, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete irresolvable sourcing problems, specifically, there aren't any. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Notability - Added another third party source today for more notability. Mathewignash (talk) 23:47, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Which source would that be? I still can't see anything conferring independent notability. The only vaguely-sounding RS in the article is being used to cite that a certain toy of Divebomb was issued. Skinny87 (talk) 05:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Commment- Its been long established that transformers fansites, forums and some books are unreliable sources of information. Dwanyewest (talk) 17:47, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.