Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divei Ilai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. J I P | Talk 06:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Divei Ilai
Delete no assertion of notability. the Talmud is 1000's of pages long. this is one incredibly tiny piece. It's not clear why the author has chosen it for inclusion into wikipedia. I attempted to contact the author for an explanation of significance, but got no answer. Disclosure: I am very familiar with the Talmud and therefore my opinion is well-informed. the.crazy.russian  (T)   (C)   (E)  12:46, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 01:18, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
 * keep and merge with Giant Lion, which should be deleted. JRP 02:51, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Umm... what? Merge with a page that should be deleted? Eh? Stifle 00:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't seem to warrant its own page. Stifle 00:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Mailer Diablo 08:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment Giant Lion, which was co-nominated with this article, was deleted by AfD. the.crazy.russian   (T)   (C)   (E)  14:32, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Too tiny a tidbit to be relevant to anyone. --InShaneee 21:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above --Khoikhoi 06:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.