Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diversity, equity, and inclusion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗ plicit  00:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Diversity, equity, and inclusion

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I created this title in November, and it hasn't become an article. It should be redirected somewhere. But where? Or perhaps people will object and write an article now that it's at AFD - so it is here rather than RFD. User:力 (powera, π,  ν ) 17:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. User:力 (powera,  π,  ν ) 17:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Discrimination-related deletion discussions. StrayBolt (talk) 17:46, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. StrayBolt (talk) 17:56, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The topic area of workplace diversity is underdeveloped, and what we do have is slanted towards advocacy or how-to. Two plausible merge/redirect targets are and Diversity (business), both of which need work. (The student essay Removing the glass ceiling from the United States ought to be retitled or merged somewhere as well.) Cheers, gnu 57  18:59, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Every Wikipedia article started out like this, and with time it will probably grow. A short article is still better than nothing. This is the most common term for this concept and it will help to have an article in place for people to write more about it. Crossroads -talk- 04:22, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article's topic is complex. Content is growing and also it is being seen by a few... it needs more precise and specific work in different aspects to be better but just pushing it for deletion is not helpful or very constructive. --Zblace (talk) 07:30, 21 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is obviously an important enough topic for Wikipedia. Some people seeing the acronym DEI will wonder what it means and search in Wikipedia. It could well be contentious how to define it, describe it, etc., but that just means it will take a while to settle down and may need protection eventually. editeur24 (talk) 13:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - The topic is notable, and while complex, it could certainly be turned into a very useful article. Guettarda (talk) 15:48, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.