Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diversity Woman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Mayoticks (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Diversity Woman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails in passing WP:GNG. Can't find any reliable sources anywhere about this organisation, just their own website and some pr webpages. Mayoticks (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Mayoticks (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  19:56, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/31/every-woman-should-be-her-own-chief-financial-officer.html https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20121218005921/en/Lynn-Tilton-named-2012-Diversity-Woman-Magazine%E2%80%99s
 * Keep It passes WP:GNG and have multiple appearances in media. As the article was created in 2014 many refs are being archived. Although, these references should be enough to satisfy GNG.

Please do a WP:BEFORE to make any action on the page as you did with nominating previous pages too. Pilean (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, Pilean! Thanks for clarifying. By seeing current sources It seems it passes WP:GNG. I will withdraw the nomination and sorry for any actions. As I am still learning how to be master of Wiki. Mayoticks (talk) 22:07, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * @Pilean, the first isn't coverage of the magazine and the second is a press release. Neither of those help to establish that this meets GNG. Blablubbs | talk 14:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.