Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diverspections


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:56, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Diverspections

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not seem to meet wiki notability guidelines and has multiple issues. Tyros1972 Talk 12:48, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as a neologism and original research.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  19:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 22:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per Cullen. Ansh666 02:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:NOTNEO, both Google Scholar and Google Books turn up zero hits for the term. Both of the first two sources listed are connected to the individual Manfred F. R. Kets de Vries who appears to have coined the term (can't really tell as neither of those two sources is searchable online) and so are not independent, nobody else appears to have picked up on the term.  The third source listed is searchable online and does not appear to contain the term.  WP:42 is not met.    15:08, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.