Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divided Loyalties (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Past Doctor Adventures. Star  Mississippi  18:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)

Divided Loyalties (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NBOOK No WP:SIGCOV Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 10:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy, Literature,  and England. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 07:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Past_Doctor_Adventures as an alternative to deletion. I found a lot of fan reviews online, including some fun old 1999 listservs, which makes me want someone to write an article about it as one of the worst Doctor Who novels of all time... but I found no RS at all for NBOOK. ~ L 🌸  (talk) 03:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge selectively and redirect to Past_Doctor_Adventures as WP:Alternative to deletion to preserve the content as history, until someone can show sources to establish notability. The target could benefit by preserving a condensed plot summary. This web article, while only a briefly mentioning the topic, could be used as a secondary source for the appearances of the Fifth Doctor and the Toymaker in the novel. Daranios (talk) 10:58, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * I don't mind a merge if Daranios can find a place for content from the article. ~ L 🌸  (talk) 02:33, 16 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.