Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divine plane


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Plane (esotericism). Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Divine plane

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This page is a tiny stub and has been since creation in 2008. There are no sources whatsoever. The subject matter appears to relate to Theosophy and anything on the matter of a divine plane can and should be fully contained within that article. There is nothing in this article that could be merged, so merge is inappropriate. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 16:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 16:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with the nominator, also there is mention of the "divine plane" on the Plane (esotericism) article. I am not sure why we have all these unsourced stubs for many of these "planes" when an article already describes such content. Psychologist Guy (talk) 17:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Plane (esotericism) - I am not finding any sources that would justify a separate article on this topic, as the sources I am finding that do discuss it are not ones that would generally be considered to be reliable. But, while I agree with the nominator that the complete lack of any sourced content would prevent a Merge, the fact that the subject is already covered in its own section in the article on a broader topic means that a Redirect would be preferable over straight deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 17:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge with Adi (or vice versa) or redirect to 'Plane_(esotericism)'.--dchmelik☀️🕉︎☉🦉🐝🐍☤☆(talk 03:16, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Plane (esotericism). As argued above, the topic is not article-worthy and the content is not merge-worthy. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:43, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.