Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diving Almanac & Book of Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 07:18, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Diving Almanac & Book of Records
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

User:GEERG went on a self-promotional tour yesterday; two of his articles were speedily deleted, although this remains. Anyway, this article too should be deleted because it's essentially advertising for a product that no third-party sources have indicated has notability. Biruitorul Talk 15:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No sources in the article, and nothing I can find on-line apart from blogs and press releases. Notability not established. Tevildo (talk) 16:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Article lacks third-party reliable sources: 4 self-refs and 2 personal websites that don't even seem to mention the book. Not notable. --RexxS (talk) 15:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.