Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diving in Ko Tao


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Cirt (talk) 00:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Diving in Ko Tao

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I believe this list, (which was split from the island article) violates Wikipedia's policy of not being a directory, guidebook or an indiscriminate collection of information, and should be deleted. Paul_012 (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions.  -- Paul_012 (talk) 11:44, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- Paul_012 (talk) 11:46, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Lonely Planet's Diving in Thailand book devotes ten pages to dive sites around Ko Tao and states that 3% of the world's divers are certified here. This is one of the world's most popular dive sites, so the article could be expanded easily. A split allows the Ko Tao island article not to be swamped with tourist-related content. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:19, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks about as notable as anything else in Category:Underwater diving sites.  It also looks more interesting than Square Lake.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 17:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Not sure about the merits of this list, but if it is kept something ought to be done about the inappropriate external links in the article.  Them From  Space  21:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Strong Keep: per Lonely Planet's Diving in Thailand book which devotes ten pages to dive sites around Ko Tao. - Ret.Prof (talk) 00:34, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.