Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Division theorem aka Division algorithm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 23:29, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Division theorem aka Division algorithm
Not worth keeping --Quarl 02:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, that's not how we name articles. Gazpacho 04:49, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - bad name, POV fork (of math, mind you), all redundant (and wrong) information. --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 06:31, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete- rambling nonsense. Reyk 06:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - inconsequential fork of Remainder, not even worth a merge/redirect. --Zetawoof 08:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - first half of the article is on Remainder, as has been pointed out; second half is complete nonsense. Pierremenard
 * Delete - a superior article on the same topic exists at division algorithm. B.Wind 17:26, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.