Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divorce and Children: An Annotated Bibliography


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Singu larity  02:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Divorce and Children: An Annotated Bibliography

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an apparent essay, written in violation of our OR/synth policies. Wikipedia is does not publish original thought in this manner. Lawrence Cohen §  t / e  19:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as pure synthesis / original research. B figura  (talk) 21:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Vrac (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge to Implications of divorce or another existing article once any NPV text has been removed. This annotated bibliography isn't original research in the sense of someone's new theory. The materials reviewed appear to fall within the category of OR and might be appropriate as citations or as part of a "further reading" section. --Eastmain (talk) 23:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * comment is this by the same editor who made Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_effectiveness_of_neurofeedback_as_a_treatment_for_Attention_Deficit_/_Hyperactivity_Disorder_:_An_annotated_bibliography ? I presume so.  Merge any useful info that's not excessively verbose.  And someone give him some tips on how to make articles on wikipedia that survive, he might be able to contribute well if he's shown how to make/contribute to articles. Merkin's  mum 23:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I looked further and it is definitely him IMHO. It includes similar use of wikipedia to keep his personal notes, such as in his versions of the article, "The work cites various other Univeristy Sponsored studies and is very useful for my to my topic of effects of divorce on children." The other article in his versions says "The clinical trials addressed in this work would provide excellent information for the body of my essay."Merkin's mum 23:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete or Move to user space. This is simply a personal essay/notes. While it could be used for research in other articles, it's certainly not appropriate for mainspace. Vassyana (talk) 00:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete not an article. JuJube (talk) 01:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Ros0709 (talk) 09:14, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as violation of WP:NOR. —TreasuryTag —t —c 09:16, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: to date, eight similar articles have been created within a short timeframe. There is ongoing discussion about them here. Ros0709 (talk) 09:22, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, not an encyclopedia article. Get a web site. WillOakland (talk) 02:36, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to user space. Like the other "An Annotated Bibliography" articles, these are personal notes. The editor is however apparently familiar with the subjects at hand, and should thus be encouraged to integrate the information from those essays into the appropriate articles (e.g. Divorce). -- Fullstop (talk) 19:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC) Like the various other "An Annotated Bibliography" essays, these are apparently dumps from a University of Florida course. (cf. "About the author" at the end of this article). -- Fullstop (talk) 19:43, 19 April 2008 (UTC) ps: not likely a multiple offender, but apparently all SPA accounts of students of the same course.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.