Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divyen Raithatha


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Divyen Raithatha

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional biography for a non-notable producer and businessman. Re-created twice by blocked, possibly paid, editors. The article is entirely based on trivial company listings and a few short promo interviews for a movie, with almost no independent coverage about the producer himself, let alone in-depth coverage. His other business activities have no independent sources at all. A Google search in English showed no other usable sources. The last AfD-debate has been NAC-closed as "no consensus", although it had 2 delete statements (incl. nom) from experienced Wikipedia editors. GermanJoe (talk) 10:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 10:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 10:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanJoe (talk) 10:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:39, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - two references are about the movie, not the subject. Other references are dead links, industry directories, or the subject's corporate website.  No authoritative references demonstrate notability.--Rpclod (talk) 17:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass the general notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.