Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixie Chili and Deli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep (or Merge). The decision to merge or not is left as an editorial decision apart from this AfD. &mdash;Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Dixie Chili and Deli
A local chili restaurant in Kentucky. I cannot think of a reason why this would be notable. GabrielF 03:33, 24 June 2006 (UTC) *Delete, fails WP:CORP. --Coredesat 06:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable restaurant. --Ter e nce Ong (Chat 03:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Five-alarm delete per above. Jammo (SM247) 05:02, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:CORP Alphachimp   talk  05:53, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete under WP:CORP guidelines. --Arnzy (whats up?)  08:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I don't know, guys, they've got chicken fingers and salads now... delete per above. --TrianaC 11:40, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Finger licking tasty. But non-notable and it fails WP:CORP. Delete doktorb | words 11:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep vote changing after info below doktorb | words 10:05, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong merge Cheap Redirect to Cincinnati chili, a notable chili variation. Notable to fans of the style of Chilli, and a plausible search term. However, any info can be covered in that article.   young  american  (ahoy-hoy) 13:37, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rohirok, as it is quite significant in the development of the chili sytle, and merge per Rohirok if not kept. I't be nice to have the history kept for future use and for incorporation into the main article on the chili style if it is decided that the restaurant chain does not deserve its own article. Personally, I have always toyed with the notion of bringing Cincinnati chili to feature status, and I would hate to lose this info.  young  american  (ahoy-hoy) 21:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I am a Cincinnatian. Dixie is not a single restaurant, but a chain of restaurants in the area, much like Skyline Chili. Though now a smaller chain than Skyline, Dixie predates Skyline by 20 years, and is a contemporary of Empress Chili, where this style of chili was invented. Consequently, its history is an important part of the development of Cincinnati chili, a distinct and notable regional cuisine. If the Dixie article is not kept, I vote that it be Merged with the Cincinnati chili article. There is encyclopedia-worthy information in this article. Rohirok 16:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Cincinnati chili. Is it possible to get Cincinatti chili in Manhattan? it sounds yummy Bwithh 17:13, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Cincinnati chili, since I just now realized we have that article. Now I'm hungry... --Coredesat 21:23, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep if Rohirok is correct then I think this deserves to say. (Never heard of Cincinnati chili but it sounds good so I'm gonna try it sometime.) Viridae 00:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as per other suggestions. From the material in the article as it now stands, there isn't enough info for this article to be anything but a stub but given its historical contributions to chili (sorry, let me stop chuckling) it should be mentioned there. Janet13 05:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep all articles related to Cincinnati-style chili. I live in Cleveland, and there's a Skyline Chili here too.  GilliamJF 22:49, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep This is part of the "Cincinnati Style Chili" family an important regional favorite. Most out of towners look for a "Cincinnati Style Chili" restaurant to try during their visit to the Greater Cincinnati Area. My co-workers, in Northern Ohio order this chili on line. Tomas417 23:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge with Cincinnati chili as a last resort. Yamaguchi先生 07:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.