Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixon (Rapper)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Arguments suggest that this artist is simply too new to have proper notability at the moment.. Joyous! | Talk 03:25, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Dixon (Rapper)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only one even semi appropriate reference (Mafia Magazine). Doesn't seem to meet GNG or musician notability. Moreover, the article itself is written in an incredibly biased manner, and even if we decide that this person is notable, the article should be WP:TNTed and started over. InsertCleverPhraseHere  22:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)


 * DELETE - Yet another WP:PROMO and WP:SPAM article from a repeat offender. -- Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:16, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Vineetpl7 (talk) 08:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC) As the person is notable as the references is listed in the Mafia Magazine and if you think the content is itself an incredibly biased. I can rewrite the article one again and update this page.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Musician who just released his first album which does not seem to have performed well enough to cause him to pass notability guidelines for musicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:26, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete although I would not call it spam or promotional material (it's well-written and neutral) I can only find the one source in Mafia magazine that appears to be enough to point toward notability. But I would say that in this case that one article is not enough to pass the general notability guideline for inclusion.  It might happen in the future though, but that's later and not now.  Until then, try another wiki.  If, however, more third party articles are found I'd be willing to reconsider and possibly change my position.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:33, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - not because it is promotional (which it is, at least partly - for instance Though KD is the same perfectionist he ever was, he feels quite adamant about the songs on this album which is both promotional and difficult to parse) but because there are no signs of it meeting WP:NMUSIC. One source is not enough. WP:TOOSOON. --bonadea contributions talk 14:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.