Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixon Golf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Dixon Golf

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Delete per WP:NCORP. Not enough notability, nor good independent references/sources. Golf related sources aren't reliable Dark Juliorik (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:49, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Arizona. Shellwood (talk) 15:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep The first two refs in the article discuss the most expensive golf ball in some depth. A quick newspaper search finds this, and there many more hits that I haven't looked at more closely. There seems to be enough independent coverage here. MB 23:19, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * The first two refs are obviously the same press release that also can be found in many other places, e.g. here is the full release. Other refs are also PR. wjematherplease leave a message... 00:01, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, but the newspaper coverage is better. MB 00:32, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. There just doesn't seem to be enough significant coverage in truly independent reliable secondary sources – mostly blogs and press releases with a few interviews. wjematherplease leave a message... 12:05, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, Not enough RS to pass WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 15:42, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, Per above. Little coverage that's not either self-published or a copy of it. 07:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.