Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dixons City Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Nomination withdrawn: speedy. Someones given the article a little tidy, it was a tip before! It needs sourcing etc, I will tag for sources. Computerjoe 's talk 21:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Dixons City Academy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No doubt notable (IMO any city academy would be due to the political importance) but article is complete mess and needs to be deleted Computerjoe 's talk 20:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I believe schools at this level are generally considered notable. There's hardly anything in the article to constitute a 'complete mess'. I've tagged it as a stub.--Michig (talk) 20:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Afd is not the place to put articles in need of cleanup as the nominator stated this academy is no doubt notable, as such it should be kept. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:06, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, AfD is not cleanup. Nominator even admits that the subject is "no doubt notable". Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Subject has lots of precedent for being notable. Article has been stubbified by Michig. Tanthalas39 (talk) 22:15, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Verifiable by reliable sources. Improve, not remove. --Ryan Delaney talk 22:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per everybody. Just needs a cleanup.  Ford MF (talk) 01:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.