Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diyar Al Muharraq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 03:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Diyar Al Muharraq

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertising Rathfelder (talk) 14:59, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bahrain-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islands-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:03, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:04, 26 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment The promotional content was added in this edit. I've reverted all the way back to the April 19, 2016 version. It's just a stub now, but it has references and isn't horribly promotional. No comment (yet) on notability, however. clpo13(talk) 16:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC)


 * That is a great improvement. It's a vast project and clearly notable.Rathfelder (talk) 21:09, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems to meet WP:GEOLAND standards. I've attempted some additional cleanup and corrections based on the contents of the given references. From what I've found through searches, this seems to exist under this name (which it shares with the islands' major developer, complicating searches). However, it's strange how little non-promo content exists for such a large project, though perhaps it's an issue of searching in English. Everything seems to be warmed-over press releases. But GEOLAND states Named natural features are often notable, provided information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist and this subject seems to meet that. Antepenultimate (talk) 23:57, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:OUTCOMES. We almost always keep all islands but the smallest rocks and crags, even artificial or private ones. See examples at Articles_for_deletion/Hay_Island_(Connecticut), Articles_for_deletion/Rahmaniyah_Island, and Articles_for_deletion/Lower_Birch_Island. Bearian (talk) 22:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.