Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dizzle, Jim


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete - Appears to be a hoax - unacceptable on Wikipedia. Rudget . 16:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Dizzle, Jim

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable self-published author Corvus cornix  talk  04:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Stinks of a hoax, so tagged. Blueboy96 04:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree. Further research on Google leads to the conclusion that there is no such person.   Corvus cornix  talk  04:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Hoax, no ghits. //   Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 04:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete likely hoax; web link in refs. doesn't work so also unsourced. JJL (talk) 04:52, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non notable, probably hoax entry. Snowfire51 (talk) 05:42, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete hoaxalicious. JuJube (talk) 14:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete hoax. A total of one relevant ghit and it's to this Wikipedia entry. Therefore, it's a hoax Doc Strange (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.