Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dizzy Pong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete-- JForget 00:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Dizzy Pong

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Trivial nonsense from start to finish. It doesn't fit any speedy category however so here it is. Mattinbgn\talk 23:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Some admin spare us, and just shoot this. This rather says it all.--Docg 00:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "but has not grown" statement made me doubt that this is a WP:NFT violation. Searching "dizzy pong" in Google gives 5 hits, most are from myspace and livejournal.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:14, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Did some Google search and found Dizzy Pong only twice on facebook entries. Seems not to be an commonly used term for a game. No further public references to be found soon. Can not improve the article, recommend to delete it. Neozoon 00:18, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Let's see... WP:N, WP:RS, WP:GHITS, WP:V, WP:INDISCRIMINATE, WP:MADEUP, WP:OR, WP:HOAX... Uhh, any more?--WaltCip 01:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This seems to be some game some bored kids made up. Fails Notability -- Mr.crabby   (Talk)   02:49, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't find any significant reference, fails WP:Verifiable.  Wikipedia is not for something you made up in your frat one lazy weekend. Accounting4Taste 03:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, haven't we deleted this before? Wait, that was some variation of beer pong. Not much difference, clearly made up in school/in the author's basement/five minutes before this was written, or some variation thereof. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:45, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not for things made up in the garage one day. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  11:21, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NOT. Looks like Original research.  This is unsourced and Im having difficulty finding reliable sources on this subject.  Tbo 157   (talk)  15:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable, the phrase "but has not grown" shows that. Oysterguitarist 17:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.