Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DjDTM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:23, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

DjDTM
Non-notable website/bio - Rudykog 06:39, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

Ickalanda: Please do not delete, just information about the website.
 * Comment - I know, but it's not notable enough for Wikipedia. See Notability. - Rudykog 06:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

I think it should go, it is not notable enough for example if it was a article about slashdot no one would have any objections but i've never heard of this website and i don't really see how it belongs in wikipedia all that much Kingpomba 06:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

I was hoping it could be created before the site became super popular and the site is known in my local area (Kalamazoo/Portage MI) http://djdtm.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=723#723 - DjDTM

Okay hold on I am getting a screenshot of the number of views per month based of individual IPs that looked at at least 2 pages and stayed for longer than 30 minutes. -Ickalanda

Okay I have it:

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/4348/visits23nk.jpg

-Ickalanda


 * Delete Non-notable website..  OhNo itsJamie Talk 07:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

How is it non-notable with 6,000+ viewers? Yes that is not super popular but it has a steady increase and is well known in my local area. -Ickalanda


 * Comment - Usually when Wikipedians look for notability, they look for things like Alexa Internet rankings (DjDTM.com isn't even ranked), Google testing hits (DjDTM.com comes out at a little over 700), and sometimes forum accounts (DjDTM.com has 34). Notability has more to do with something that many people around the world may know about or have heard of, not just locals. - Rudykog 07:05, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

A few people from Massachusetts know about it and some people from the UK if that counts. Also the majority of viewers do not register at the forums and just watch the movies.


 * Comment - Compare 6,000 a month with Masamania's 125,000+ a week. It still wasn't enough. (see Articles for deletion/Masamania) - Rudykog 07:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

DjDTM - Just delete the site already. Wiki is an unrealiable source for information anyway.
 * Delete. Per all of the above.--Fuhghettaboutit 07:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Haakon 09:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not-notible, and the guy voting keep seems to be the site owner. -- 9cds(talk) 14:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn. --Ter e nce Ong 16:09, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. --Starionwolf 18:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:WEB. No alexa rank. M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 (T 23:50, 28 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.