Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dj jagz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Olaf Davis (talk) 18:40, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Dj jagz

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. DJ with sketchy notability. Only primary sources are used in the article. Google News returns nothing. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @184  · 03:24, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I cannot find any evidence that this DJ has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable sources. It appears that the E-lastik label and its NYC Underground Dance Party Vol. 3 record exist(ed) – see this page at Discogs – but it does not appear that this DJ achieved notability due to his connection to that label. Actually, I don't think the label is notable either – but then again, it doesn't have a Wikipedia article. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete WP:CREATIVE#1 would be the most likely criterion, but does not seem to be supported. - 2/0 (cont.) 08:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - questionable notability, no significant coverage in reliable independent sources. MikeWazowski (talk) 15:17, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.