Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmarket


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:36, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Dmarket

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article about an unremarkable blockchain-related company. Likely undisclosed native advertising in violation of the terms of use -- creator has no edits outside this topic. MER-C 14:01, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:45, 9 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete this highly promotional text, created by a kamikaze account, about a subject lacking notability aside from mentions in a few trade blogs and sites. The first thing they learn apparently is to cram the text with "references". Say "cheese!" -The Gnome (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly promotional, at least the way the article is written right now. And like The Gnome, a quick search online for me turned up no reliable independent sources (only their own site/advertising). Clearly fails WP:GNG by that measure. Tillerh11 (talk) 19:50, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG. cinco deL3X1 ◊distænt write◊  21:41, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. cinco deL3X1  ◊distænt write◊  21:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete promotional, thus fails WP:NOT. ICO and native advertising is a deadly combination. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 22:55, 9 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.