Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitri Bukharin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Crimson Dynamo. Liz Read! Talk! 02:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Dmitri Bukharin

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No WP:SIGCOV, article contains no secondary sources, only primary cites to comic books. Suggest redirect to Crimson Dynamo. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge to Crimson Dynamo per WP:PRESERVE and WP:ATD. BOZ (talk) 11:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:30, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Crimson Dynamo, nothing to merge due to lack of independent refs (outside of a plot summary, I guess). Nothing to warrant keeping this (fails WP:GNG). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:51, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect due to GNG failure, sources are WP:PRIMARY. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:36, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * You have already !voted "redirect" directly above. ✗  plicit  12:40, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Crimson Dynamo - No sources indicating enough independent notability that this should be split out from the main article on the Crimson Dynamo. A short biography of the character already exists on the main article, and as there is no secondary sourced material or analysis here, there really isn't anything further that needs to be merged. Rorshacma (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.