Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitri Mehlhorn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:04, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Dmitri Mehlhorn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is nothing on this page that justifies an encyclopedia entry. The person is a former employee of a notable organization and a minor blogger. The page should redirect to Students First as that is a legitimately notable organization for which this person worked for a period of time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.151.52 (talk) 18:12, 17 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor. Above text is copied from the article talk page.  I remain neutral on the nomination itself.  -- Finngall   talk  18:36, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   20:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:42, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. nothing in the article indicates notability -- not authorship of a few articles, nor COO od a major firm (as distinct from what would be the situation if he had written books, and was CEO of the firm). The refs are almost entirely mere notices or articles he has himself written or his own PR bios.  DGG ( talk ) 20:39, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.