Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitrij Buławka-Fankidejski


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus is he isn't yet notable. , if you would like this restored to draft to incubate and work on, just let me know. Star  Mississippi  16:51, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Dmitrij Buławka-Fankidejski

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It's WP:TOOSOON for this sculptor who does not yet meet WP:GNG. I'm unable to find independent WP:SIGCOV on his work. He designed a public art work, but everything I find on it does not mention him, only the person who is subject of the statue itself (a race car driver), so I don't think he meets WP:NARTIST either. He's an assistant professor, and has not had many shows, his work is not represented in several notable museum collections, nor has there been in-depth analysis of his work in reviews or articles about him. Bringing this here so the community can decide if the article should be retained or not. Netherzone (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 01:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment There are similar issues with Alicja Buławka-Fankidejska and Statue of Ayrton Senna. I don't see any indication that his work has been covered in English sources. I'll note that there is no requirement that sources are in English, but my lack of competence in Polish makes that difficult for me. I did search for German and French sources, I have a access to [Art (magazine)|Art]] for example, via the Wikipedia library, but came up with nothing. Vexations (talk) 20:43, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @Vexations, yes I saw those two related articles, and they are similar to this one but have a bit more coverage. Netherzone (talk) 05:28, 7 January 2022 (UTC)

Nbarchaeo (talk) WP:SIGCOVWP:GNG Notability is proven by numerous mentioned in the news related to:


 * Ayrton Senna statue is inaugurated next to museum in Poland, where his name is mentioned in Wyborcza.pl and Polski Związek Motorowy


 * 2021. "Pomnik Ayrtona Senny stanął w Wałbrzychu. Pomysłodawcą jest były kierowca wyścigowy Jerzy Mazur", published at "Wyborcza.pl"
 * 2021. "Wałbrzych ma pomnik Ayrtona Senny", published at "Polski Związek Motorowy"


 * Gdańskie Fasady OdNowa project where his name is mentioned www.trojmiasto.pl and PORTAL MIASTA GDAŃSKA


 * 2018. "Zobacz odnowione gdańskie fasady. Sobotni spacer", published at "www.trojmiasto.pl"
 * 2018. "Gdańskie Fasady OdNowa” 2018 coraz bliżej", published at "PORTAL MIASTA GDAŃSKA"

Nbarchaeo (talk)
 * Comment - Please sign your posts, thanks in advance. These are not in-depth significant coverage - except perhaps the last one in Portal Miasta Gdanska which talks about he and his wife's fabrication techniques. That is not much to base a biographic article on, and not enough to substantiate notability per Wikipedia standards. The other sources are simply "name checks" or a mention; one contains a single sentence that says he made a sculpture. WP:MILL and WP:ROUTINE What is needed are multiple in-depth articles or reviews, or a monograph or inclusion in art historical texts. Netherzone (talk) 15:47, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment - Thank you for your contribution Netherzone. I really appreciate your help in pointing out the weak spots of the article. When I have prepared it I thought a selection of exhibitions and works will be sufficient. I will try to improve the article.Nbarchaeo (talk)  21:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - I agree that the article had to be corrected to meet the requirements of WP:GNG. In my opinion, the article should be kept WP:KEEP, because I have corrected most of the necessary parts. Thanks to Netherzone also key problems were also removed. Nbarchaeo (talk)  18:1, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NARTIST. The artist isn't in any collections that I can see. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see that the article has been improved enough since it was brought here that it should be kept. There is still no indication that his work is the subject of critical discourse, or that it has been discussed in independent secondary sources. Vexations (talk) 17:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.