Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitry and Natalia Baksheevy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  11:27, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Dmitry and Natalia Baksheevy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article consists primarily of rumors surrounding Dmitry and Natalia Baksheevy, two individuals who have been arrested but not convicted for a crime in Russia. (The article even describes these allegations as "rumors"!) This is violative of WP:BLPCRIME and should be deleted. May His Shadow Fall Upon You ● 📧 15:10, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 15:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 15:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep The Original article in Russian says that both have been convicted by June 2019. This version article needs updating to reflect this, but not a reason to delete.-- Auric   talk  21:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Okay, but what makes this encyclopedic? Not every murderer receives a Wikipedia page, even if the murder gains media coverage. May His Shadow Fall Upon You ● 📧 14:38, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:56, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Appear to be more notable than the average run-of-the-mill murderers, given the possible nature of their crimes. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:23, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 20:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. They have SIGCOV in global WP:RS/P like The Washington Post, The Independent, and Time Magazine. Britishfinance (talk) 20:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets GNG per the WP:RS which NEXISTS. The Washington Post Wm335td (talk) 22:37, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.