Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmytro Drogalchuk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Great Cockroach 007 and BiNA have been blocked.  Sandstein  19:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Dmytro Drogalchuk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable blogger/journalist. Coverage appears to be exclusively in the publication Obozrevatel, and consists of an inclusion in a top-10 list and a bio. Amusingly, that second source establishes that the subject has worked for Obozrevatel, which makes the source non-independent to boot. Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:NBIO The Ukrainian and Russian wikipedia articles do not provide any additional sources other than links to the subject's blog. I attempted to find more sources online in English, Russian, and Ukrainian and failed, although I will admit that I'm not very familiar with Ukrainian media and could have missed something. Originally nominated for PROD by me, dePROD by initial editor Great Cockroach 007 with the justification I withdraw the nomination because of the obvious importance of the person. Firstly, the rating indicated in the article and biographical dossier is on the most popular information resource in Ukraine. Secondly, I will look for sources that I have met on the Internet. They definitely were. In any case, I will try to find the archives. Thirdly, in the case of a shortage of sources, put a template for improvement, although all the information in the article is available in the main source. signed,Rosguill talk 19:31, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC)


 * I will not specifically justify and defend. The article is a translation of a fairly well-known character in Ukarin, far from narrow circles. Compiled by the TOP site (especially the second place in the rating) + biographical dossier on the site, which is the most popular or included in the TOP-5 of Ukrainian information resources. This is an information bomb that automatically gives value. Yes, as far as I know, the subject of the article worked with this resource. But not now and this is indicated in the biography. What makes the source absolutely neutral. Now, obviously, Dmytro is working with another Ukrainian giant - the Korrespondent. This is indicated as in the biography [3]. And he is far from a novice blogger and journalist. You do not look at age. As far as I know, he was leading children's programs on small television channels in Ukraine; and since the beginning of the war, in his 14-15 years, he has already become a special correspondent (this is in his biography on the same Obozrevatel). I personally oppose deletion as an article translator. --Great Cockroach 007 (talk) 22:52, 6 November 2018 (UTC) This editor was blocked for sockpuppeting


 * I was invited to vote as a user who edited the main article. Let nothing colossal, I did not write and did not correct, but leave the opinion. I do not see a particular problem for removal. Perhaps for the English Wikipedia this is less important than for the Ukrainian version of the project. But, of course, this is important, it is confirmed by the Observer. You just look at the popularity of the browser itself. And a small remark, this is not as a criterion of significance, but for information only - an article about this “newcomer”, 2,500 people looked at this month. And we are talking about a 19-year-old journalist from Ukraine. For me, this is an important indicator. And there, let the public decide. -BiNA (talk) 23:26, 6 November 2018 (UTC) This editor was blocked for sockpuppeting

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Additional comment from nom I see from the edit history of the editors that have commented above that this subject was already brought to AfD under a different name back in May Articles for deletion/Dmytro_Baker signed,Rosguill talk 23:35, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was a weak article, as from a dictionary. I invited the author of this article to express his opinion here. I wrote a full translation, but not a small note, as from a dictionary. I see no problems with this. Then I first left a comment and only when I figured out with significance - I voted. --Great Cockroach 007 (talk) 23:44, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:14, 14 November 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 01:17, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't think this article passes notability guidelines. At minimum needs to be rewritten since it's clearly self-promotional. Skirts89 (talk) 17:19, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Regarding the accounts that you accused of a puppet existence, it's you in vain. I, as a patrolman and author in Ukrainian Wikipedia, know about these users, they are quite popular. This is a married couple and a sister of a member of the couple who registered on Wikipedia for a theme evening in Ukraine. And the fact that they contribute from one PC is not a reason for blocking. Regarding the character about which the article, then everything is obvious. For Ukrainian journalism, especially in the war zone in the east of the country, there is significance and it is quite large. A biography on such a resource is a great achievement for a journalist. And the rating, which is one of the main ones in the Ukrainian media, makes Dmytro also very significant in the blogosphere. My opinion. —Jack Bulitlo (talk) 22:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.