Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Do a vince


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was do a delete. Sr13 09:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Do a vince

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Prod removed, bringing to AfD. Neologism used, if it exists at all, only "in and around the Peterborough area in the UK" as the article itself claims. No google hits to support it; they were all using that phrase in the context of "do a Vince (various people named Vince) impression/tribute/song/etc" Jamoche 00:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not noteable/hoax/nonsense. This is just an homage to the creator's friend Vince.Merkinsmum 01:37, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable neologism, and tribute to a Vince. Flyguy649 talk contribs 02:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable neologism and is a tribute to vince. Oysterguitarist 02:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO - No reliable source talking about this phrase. "Do a vince" should mean lead your team back in the final seconds to win a national championship ;) Corpx 02:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Do a Delete or else I'm going to start putting all of my personal sayings on here. --Bongwarrior 03:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as made up one day. I, personally, would think that "doing a Vince" would mean having a wonderful tenor voice and singing "Go Rest High on That Mountain"... Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 04:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment or to push, big, talentless wrestlers, prehaps? Lugnuts 07:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NEO and WP:NFT. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 06:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable sources asserted. I thought "Do a vince" meant faking your death Vince McMahon style. Spellcast 17:07, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, made up. I think the article describes the effort used in writing it. Realkyhick 18:39, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for all of the above reasons. Bearian 18:40, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination, total waste of bandwidth, disk space, and most importantly our time. Burntsauce 22:43, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.